![]() ![]() Now, with the release of Ruby 3, the ability to write type signatures for programs as well as standard libraries are being shipped as well. ![]() Since then, the Ruby team has been working to build a foundation for the community to develop type checkers on. When Matz faced this issue as the language designer to choose between the two, he declared that Ruby 3 will support static type checking. On the one hand, statically typed languages are suitable for larger projects, cutting down on flexibility, on the other hand, dynamically typed languages make building software easy, but increase the complexity in scaling it up. The list is long, and instead of continuing this way, let’s now dive deeper into individual updates and find out what importance they hold in the future of Ruby development! TypingĬhoosing between static and dynamic typing has always been an issue for programming languages.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |